lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 02:47:29 +0100 From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl> To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> Cc: 'Ilkka Prusi' <ilkka.prusi@...inet.fi>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc1 On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 05:45:16PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > From: Ilkka Prusi > > Note that /sbin is now just a symlink to /usr/sbin on Debian since 10 (Buster) as per FHS[1][2]. > > > > [1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/fhs > > [2] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/09/debian-10-playing-catch-up-with-the-rest- > > of-the-linux-world-thats-a-good-thing/ > > Which is exactly 100% backwards :-) I agree with you that, if all, it's /usr/sbin which should be a symlink, to reduce typing and to get rid of a vestige of _The_ Unix machine having /bin spill to a disk that used to have user homes. But, /sbin is a symlink on only _some_ Debian installations. There's currently a discussion whether to go deeper into this scheme, abandon it or do nothing. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .--[ Makefile ] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ # beware of races ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ all: pillage burn ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ `----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists