linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add beacon,imx8mn-beacon-kit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210104094526.GA4142@dragon>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:45:28 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add
 beacon,imx8mn-beacon-kit

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:50:48PM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:32 PM Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 08:48:08AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > Add beacon,imx8mn-beacon-kit to list of compatible options.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >
> > You need to stop posting patches that have dependency not accepted yet,
> > or explicitly mention the dependency.
> 
> Sorry about that.  I wrongly assumed the series dependency would have
> been accepted by the time this was reviewed.  I'll try not to do that
> again.
> 
> Based on your e-mail from [1], it appears as if you've accepted the
> other series upon which this depends.  Is there any way this can be
> reapplied again, or do you need me to re-submit it?

Applied all, thanks.