[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210104101504.GA878104@krava>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:15:04 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf stat: Fix wrong skipping for per-die aggregation
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 09:04:09AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
> void update_stats(struct stats *stats, u64 val)
> @@ -275,16 +276,39 @@ void evlist__save_aggr_prev_raw_counts(struct evlist *evlist)
>
> static void zero_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter)
> {
> - if (counter->per_pkg_mask)
> - memset(counter->per_pkg_mask, 0, cpu__max_cpu());
> + struct hashmap_entry *entry;
> + size_t bkt;
> +
> + if (counter->per_pkg_mask) {
> + hashmap__for_each_entry(counter->per_pkg_mask, entry, bkt) {
> + bool *used = (bool *)entry->value;
> +
> + *used = false;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static size_t id_hash(const void *key, void *ctx __maybe_unused)
> +{
> + int socket = (int64_t)key >> 32;
> +
> + return socket;
> +}
> +
> +static bool id_equal(const void *key1, const void *key2,
> + void *ctx __maybe_unused)
> +{
> + return (int64_t)key1 == (int64_t)key2;
> }
please use more descriptive names, pkg_id_hash/pkg_id_equal or such
>
> static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter,
> struct perf_counts_values *vals, int cpu, bool *skip)
> {
> - unsigned long *mask = counter->per_pkg_mask;
> + struct hashmap *mask = counter->per_pkg_mask;
> struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = evsel__cpus(counter);
> - int s;
> + int s, d, ret;
> + uint64_t key;
> + bool *used;
>
> *skip = false;
>
> @@ -295,7 +319,7 @@ static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter,
> return 0;
>
> if (!mask) {
> - mask = zalloc(cpu__max_cpu());
> + mask = hashmap__new(id_hash, id_equal, NULL);
> if (!mask)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -317,7 +341,32 @@ static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter,
> if (s < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - *skip = test_and_set_bit(s, mask) == 1;
> + /*
> + * On multi-die system, 0 < die_id < 256. On no-die system, die_id = 0.
> + * We use hashmap(socket, die) to check the used socket+die pair.
> + */
> + d = cpu_map__get_die(cpus, cpu, NULL).die;
> + if (d < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + key = (uint64_t)s << 32 | (d & 0xff);
> + if (hashmap__find(mask, (void *)key, (void **)&used)) {
> + if (*used)
> + *skip = true;
> + *used = true;
> + } else {
> + used = zalloc(sizeof(*used));
> + if (!used)
> + return -1;
hum, what's the point of having extra bool value? once the
item is in the hashtab, we have the answer
I think you can add item to hashtab with '1' value and get
rid of that bool allocation
zero_per_pkg will be just removing all items from hashtab
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists