[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a290b74e-4b04-7eb9-196e-381a45f0a2db@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:57:19 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tools/power/x86/intel-speed-select: Fixes for regression
Hi,
On 1/4/21 12:56 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/21/20 8:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>> One side-effect of fixing the scaling frequency limits using the
>> commit eacc9c5a927e ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix intel_pstate_get_hwp_max()
>> for turbo disabled") causes stale HWP_CAP.GUARANTEED to be used as max.
>> Without processing HWP interrupts, user space needs to be able to update
>> a new max while Intel SST is in use. This is not a problem as the
>> change of guaranteed is caused by user space action, so user space knows
>> that guarantee will change.
>>
>> This series causes user space to trigger scaling_max_freq update with
>> the new base_frequency.
>>
>>
>> Srinivas Pandruvada (2):
>> tools/power/x86/intel-speed-select: Set scaling_max_freq to
>> base_frequency
>> tools/power/x86/intel-speed-select: Set higher of cpuinfo_max_freq or
>> base_frequency
>
> Thank you for your patch-series, I've applied the series to my
> review-hans branch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>
> Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
> local branch there, which might take a while.
>
> Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
> added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
> will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
> merge-window.
Note this is a templated reply, I will also cherry-pick these into the
fixes branch in this case.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists