linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: rpc-if: Remove CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVCD52-eTnEwftGz8ExMkZkJRyM=3M8zU11yhn1UNPxxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:34:16 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: rpc-if: Remove CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ifdefery

Hi Prabhakar,

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:00 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> Use __maybe_unused for the suspend()/resume() hooks and get rid of
> the CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ifdefery to improve the code.
>
> Suggested-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rpc-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rpc-if.c
> @@ -176,15 +176,14 @@ static int rpcif_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> -static int rpcif_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused rpcif_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct spi_controller *ctlr = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
>         return spi_controller_suspend(ctlr);
>  }
>
> -static int rpcif_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused rpcif_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct spi_controller *ctlr = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> @@ -192,17 +191,13 @@ static int rpcif_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
>  }
>
>  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rpcif_spi_pm_ops, rpcif_spi_suspend, rpcif_spi_resume);
> -#define DEV_PM_OPS     (&rpcif_spi_pm_ops)
> -#else
> -#define DEV_PM_OPS     NULL
> -#endif
>
>  static struct platform_driver rpcif_spi_driver = {
>         .probe  = rpcif_spi_probe,
>         .remove = rpcif_spi_remove,
>         .driver = {
>                 .name   = "rpc-if-spi",
> -               .pm     = DEV_PM_OPS,
> +               .pm     = &rpcif_spi_pm_ops,

You're aware rpcif_spi_pm_ops is now always referenced and thus emitted,
increasing kernel size by 92 bytes if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n?
This may matter for RZ/A SoCs running from internal SRAM.

>         },
>  };
>  module_platform_driver(rpcif_spi_driver);

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds