[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <287cf1cc-0e96-7609-aecd-e00dedcd90d9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:56:49 +0000
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jordan Hand <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] ipu3-cio2: Add cio2-bridge to ipu3-cio2 driver
On 04/01/2021 13:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:02 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 04/01/2021 12:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:12:35PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> ...
>
>>>> +#define NODE_SENSOR(_HID, _PROPS) \
>>>> + ((const struct software_node) { \
>>>> + .name = _HID, \
>>>> + .properties = _PROPS, \
>>>> + })
>>>> +
>>>> +#define NODE_PORT(_PORT, _SENSOR_NODE) \
>>>> + ((const struct software_node) { \
>>>> + .name = _PORT, \
>>>> + .parent = _SENSOR_NODE, \
>>>> + })
>>>> +
>>>> +#define NODE_ENDPOINT(_EP, _PORT, _PROPS) \
>>>> + ((const struct software_node) { \
>>>> + .name = _EP, \
>>>> + .parent = _PORT, \
>>>> + .properties = _PROPS, \
>>>> + })
>>> In all three I didn't get why you need outer parentheses. Without them it will
>>> be well defined compound literal and should work as is.
>> The code works fine, but checkpatch complains that macros with complex
>> values should be enclosed in parentheses. I guess now that I'm more
>> familiar with the code I'd call that a false-positive though, as nowhere
>> else in the kernel that I've seen encloses them the same way.
> I guess it is yet another false positive from checkpatch.
> I would ignore its complaints.
Will do so then
Powered by blists - more mailing lists