linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 18/63] io_uring: use bottom half safe lock for fixed file data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  4 Jan 2021 16:57:11 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+1f4ba1e5520762c523c6@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 18/63] io_uring: use bottom half safe lock for fixed file data

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>

commit ac0648a56c1ff66c1cbf735075ad33a26cbc50de upstream.

io_file_data_ref_zero() can be invoked from soft-irq from the RCU core,
hence we need to ensure that the file_data lock is bottom half safe. Use
the _bh() variants when grabbing this lock.

Reported-by: syzbot+1f4ba1e5520762c523c6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/io_uring.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -7000,9 +7000,9 @@ static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struc
 	if (!data)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	spin_lock(&data->lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&data->lock);
 	ref_node = data->node;
-	spin_unlock(&data->lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&data->lock);
 	if (ref_node)
 		percpu_ref_kill(&ref_node->refs);
 
@@ -7385,7 +7385,7 @@ static void io_file_data_ref_zero(struct
 	data = ref_node->file_data;
 	ctx = data->ctx;
 
-	spin_lock(&data->lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&data->lock);
 	ref_node->done = true;
 
 	while (!list_empty(&data->ref_list)) {
@@ -7397,7 +7397,7 @@ static void io_file_data_ref_zero(struct
 		list_del(&ref_node->node);
 		first_add |= llist_add(&ref_node->llist, &ctx->file_put_llist);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&data->lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&data->lock);
 
 	if (percpu_ref_is_dying(&data->refs))
 		delay = 0;
@@ -7520,9 +7520,9 @@ static int io_sqe_files_register(struct
 	}
 
 	file_data->node = ref_node;
-	spin_lock(&file_data->lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&file_data->lock);
 	list_add_tail(&ref_node->node, &file_data->ref_list);
-	spin_unlock(&file_data->lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&file_data->lock);
 	percpu_ref_get(&file_data->refs);
 	return ret;
 out_fput:
@@ -7679,10 +7679,10 @@ static int __io_sqe_files_update(struct
 
 	if (needs_switch) {
 		percpu_ref_kill(&data->node->refs);
-		spin_lock(&data->lock);
+		spin_lock_bh(&data->lock);
 		list_add_tail(&ref_node->node, &data->ref_list);
 		data->node = ref_node;
-		spin_unlock(&data->lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&data->lock);
 		percpu_ref_get(&ctx->file_data->refs);
 	} else
 		destroy_fixed_file_ref_node(ref_node);