linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: add QCOM_COMMAND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160978203768.14485.9660040055767141148.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:40:37 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: add QCOM_COMMAND_DB dependency

On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:56:23 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A built-in regulator driver cannot link against a modular cmd_db driver:
> 
> qcom-rpmh-regulator.c:(.text+0x174): undefined reference to `cmd_db_read_addr'
> 
> There is already a dependency for RPMh, so add another one of this
> type for cmd_db.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: qcom-rpmh: add QCOM_COMMAND_DB dependency
      commit: d957d1610c661e758426654de3b04bea6fb29f8b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark