linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9603a894-495b-3c73-0916-aea52f98fe9f@lechnology.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:11:50 -0600
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        ohad@...ery.com, praneeth@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        rogerq@...com, s-anna@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org, t-kristo@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API


> Please see the individual patches for exact changes in each patch, following is
> the only change from v1:
>  - Change the 'prus' property name to 'ti,prus' as suggested by Rob Herring,
>  which influences patch #1 and patch #2

It looks like "soc: ti: pruss: Add pruss_{request, release}_mem_region() API"
was also dropped in v2. Was this intentional?