linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aefe90e1-c133-fb5a-0e08-1d68fd950731@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:30:28 -0800
From:   Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com,
        casey@...aufler-ca.com, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com,
        gmazyland@...il.com, paul@...l-moore.com
Cc:     tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com, sashal@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
        nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement
 policy



On 2020-12-24 6:41 a.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
>> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Define a new critical data builtin policy to allow measuring
>> early kernel integrity critical data before a custom IMA policy
>> is loaded.
>>
>> Add critical data to built-in IMA rules if the kernel command line
>> contains "ima_policy=critical_data".
> 
> This sentence isn't really necessary.
> 
Will remove.
>>
>> Update the documentation on kernel parameters to document
>> the new critical data builtin policy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by:  Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks again for the "Reviewed-by" tag.

Thanks,
Tushar
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Mimi
>