[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiGHdRRmZtrcUt6g6hmATkmueNVLNnSHSBoUp-v-Qy5sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:22:49 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
syzbot <syzbot+2fc0712f8f8b8b8fa0ef@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:LINE!
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:13 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I was going to raise a question, whether you should now revert
> 073861ed77b6 ("mm: fix VM_BUG_ON(PageTail) and BUG_ON(PageWriteback)"):
> which would not have gone in like that if c2407cf7d22d were already in.
Honestly, even if it wasn't for that PageTail issue, I think
073861ed77b6 is just the right thing to do anyway. It just feels _so_
much safer to not have the possibility of that page wait thing
following while the page is possibly then being free'd and re-used at
the same time.
So I think the only reason to revert that commit would be if we were
to find that it's a huge performance problem to raise the page
refcount temporarily. Which I think is very unlikely (since we already
dirty the page structure due to the page flags modification - although
they are far enough apart that it might be a different cacheline).
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists