[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210105225228.vtg2zbpn4oud4qth@treble>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:52:28 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 5 (objtool: 3 warnings)
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 12:48:20PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 1/4/21 6:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20210104:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __do_fast_syscall_32()+0x47: call to syscall_enter_from_user_mode_work() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __sev_es_nmi_complete()+0xc7: call to sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0xb: call to lockdep_enabled() leaves .noinstr.text section
>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
These look like legit noinstr warnings. Thomas, Peter?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists