[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210105035404.c47atgdsiqoa2wuc@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:24:04 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] cpufreq: powernow-k8: add null check to policy to
avoid null pointer dereference
On 04-01-21, 13:02, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently there is an unlikely case where cpufreq_cpu_get returns a
> null policy and this will cause a null pointer dereference later on.
> Fix this by adding a null check and adding an error return.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return")
> Fixes: b43a7ffbf33b ("cpufreq: Notify all policy->cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition()")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> index 0acc9e241cd7..c5368545ba1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> @@ -913,6 +913,8 @@ static int transition_frequency_fidvid(struct powernow_k8_data *data,
The caller already has a pointer to the policy, you should rather pass
that here instead of doing cpufreq_cpu_get/put.
> freqs.new = find_khz_freq_from_fid(fid);
>
> policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(smp_processor_id());
> + if (!policy)
> + return 1;
> cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>
> cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
> --
> 2.29.2
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists