linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V3 1/1] block: reject I/O for same fd if block size changed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210105101202.GA9970@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 19:12:02 +0900
From:   Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 1/1] block: reject I/O for same fd if block size
 changed

Hello,

On 21-01-05 08:50:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:04:56AM +0900, Minwoo Im wrote:
> > It was a point that I really would like to ask by RFC whether we can
> > have backpointer to the gendisk from the request_queue.  And I'd like to
> > have it to simplify this routine and for future usages also.
> 
> I think it is the right thing to do, at least mid-term, although I
> don't want to enforce the burden on you right now.
> 
> > I will restrict this one by checking GENHD_FL_UP flag from the gendisk
> > for the next patch.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Alternatively we could make this request_queue QUEUE* flag for now.
> > 
> > As this patch rejects I/O from the block layer partition code, can we
> > have this flag in gendisk rather than request_queue ?
> 
> For now we can as the request_queue is required.  I have some plans to
> clean up this area, but just using a request_queue flag for now is
> probably the simplest, even if it means more work for me later.

Please let me prepare the next quick fix for this issue with request_queue
flag.

Thanks!