[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210105140128.GC4487@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:01:28 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP
voltage regulators
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:12:11PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> For us, the supplies are for the EP chip's power. We have the PCIe
> controller turning them "on" for power-on/resume and "off" for
> power-off/suspend. We need the "xxx-supply" property in the
> controller's DT node because of the chicken-and-egg situation: if the
> property was in the EP's DT node, the RC will never discover the EP
> to see that there is a regulator to turn on. We would be happy with
> a single supply name, something like "ep-power". We would be ecstatic
> to have two (ep0-power, ep1-power).
Why can't the controller look at the nodes describing devices for
standard properties?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists