lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYUgokeO7EhoRY9EVZhM0vUNAertgGatHz8HTHy-fW1Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:12:35 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/4] configfs: implement committable items and
 add sample code

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:22 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:

 Committable items in configfs are well defined and documented but unfortunately
> so far never implemented.
>
> The use-case we have over at the GPIO subsystem is using configfs in
> conjunction with sysfs to replace our current gpio-mockup testing module
> with one that will be much more flexible and will allow complete coverage
> of the GPIO uAPI.
>
> The current gpio-mockup module is controlled using module parameters which
> forces the user to reload it everytime they need to change the chip
> configuration or layout and makes it difficult to extend its functionality.
>
> Testing module based on configfs would allow fine-grained control over dummy
> GPIO chips but since GPIO devices must be configured before they are
> instantiated, we need committable items.
>
> This implements them and adds code examples to configfs_sample module. The
> first two patches are just cosmetic.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - fix a 'set but not used' build warning reported by kernel test robot
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - use (1UL << bit) instead of BIT() in patch 2/4
> - extend configfs_dump_one() to make it print the new flags
> - clear the CONFIGFS_USET_DIR bit on the live group dirent
>
> Rebased on top of v5.11-rc1.

This patch set makes a lot of sense to me.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ