linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ia64: fix xchg() warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 07:36:03 -0800
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: fix xchg() warning

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:17:41PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:00 PM Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have not received any reply from the ia64 maintainers, I assume they were
> > > both out of office for Christmas.
> >
> > I'm back in the office ... but have no working ia64 machines, nor time to look at patches :-(
> >
> > Should drop me from the MAINTAINTERS file.
> 
> If you like, I can apply the patch below and take that through my
> asm-generic tree along with the two bug fixes I sent:
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 0f2e55faaf7f..b74093803154 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8432,11 +8432,8 @@ F: drivers/i3c/
>  F: include/linux/i3c/
> 
>  IA64 (Itanium) PLATFORM
> -M: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> -M: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
>  L: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
> -S: Odd Fixes
> -T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux.git
> +S: Orphan
>  F: Documentation/ia64/
>  F: arch/ia64/
> 
> Is that what you had in mind? I see that Fenghua Yu has not been
> actively involved for a long time. If you are both out, that would
> make the port unmaintained, but that may actually help find someone
> else to either volunteer as a maintainer or pay someone if they
> have a commercial interest.

Yes. Fenghua has moved to working on other things, so that looks good.

Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

-Tony