[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04baeb3e-4b46-ae3a-b4e1-4663d1510b05@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:51:27 -0600
From: George Prekas <prekageo@...zon.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts/gdb: fix list_for_each
On 9/24/2020 9:20 AM, George Prekas wrote:
> If the list is uninitialized (next pointer is NULL), list_for_each gets
> stuck in an infinite loop. Print a message and treat list as empty.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Prekas <prekageo@...zon.com>
> ---
> scripts/gdb/linux/lists.py | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/lists.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/lists.py
> index c487ddf09d38..bae4d70b7eae 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/lists.py
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/lists.py
> @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ def list_for_each(head):
> raise TypeError("Must be struct list_head not {}"
> .format(head.type))
>
> + if head['next'] == 0:
> + gdb.write("list_for_each: Uninitialized list '{}' treated as
> empty\n"
> + .format(head.address))
> + return
> +
> node = head['next'].dereference()
> while node.address != head.address:
> yield node.address
Happy New Year!
Any updates on this?
Thanks,
George
Powered by blists - more mailing lists