[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3be186ef-5f1b-c3c7-f6c9-ccac6ebecaf7@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:05:16 -0600
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
<grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org>
CC: <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
<ohad@...ery.com>, <praneeth@...com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<rogerq@...nel.org>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API
Hi David,
On 1/4/21 2:11 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>
>> Please see the individual patches for exact changes in each patch, following is
>> the only change from v1:
>> - Change the 'prus' property name to 'ti,prus' as suggested by Rob Herring,
>> which influences patch #1 and patch #2
>
> It looks like "soc: ti: pruss: Add pruss_{request, release}_mem_region() API"
> was also dropped in v2. Was this intentional?
No, it is not dropped. That patch is part of a different similarly titled
"Introduce PRU platform consumer API" series [1], which is dependent on this
series and is against a different folder (maintainer): drivers/soc/ti.
regards
Suman
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=400787
Powered by blists - more mailing lists