[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202101061536.C4A93132@keescook>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:37:53 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, dvyukov@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/uaccess: Use 'unsigned long' to placate UBSAN
warnings, again
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:13:17PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:04:54PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > GCC 7 has a known bug where UBSAN ignores '-fwrapv' and generates false
> > signed-overflow-UB warnings. The type mismatch between 'i' and
> > 'nr_segs' in copy_compat_iovec_from_user() is causing such a warning,
> > which also happens to violate uaccess rules:
> >
> > lib/iov_iter.o: warning: objtool: iovec_from_user()+0x22d: call to __ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enabled
> >
> > Fix it by making the variable types match.
> >
> > This is similar to a previous commit:
> >
> > 29da93fea3ea ("mm/uaccess: Use 'unsigned long' to placate UBSAN warnings on older GCC versions")
>
> Maybe it's time we make UBSAN builds depend on GCC-8+ ?
I would be totally fine with that. The only thing I can think of that
might care is syzbot. Dmitry, does syzbot use anything older than gcc 8?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists