| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAH2r5mvgjFWwEcqt8nfiU_1GJQUU7jN=eNT-t6SBEK8jke0Msg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:26:47 -0600
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix msleep() is imprecise
This patch seems reasonable at first glance, but I was a little
concerned that we don't see many users yet of fsleep. Has there been
pushback on converting "yield" situations from using msleep to fsleep?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:09 AM Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> See Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst, msleep() is not
> for (1ms - 20ms), There is a more advanced API is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 4 ++--
> fs/cifs/connect.c | 14 +++++++-------
> fs/cifs/file.c | 6 +++---
> fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> index 472cb77..d35ce52 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@ -664,10 +664,10 @@ static void cifs_umount_begin(struct super_block *sb)
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "wake up tasks now - umount begin not complete\n");
> wake_up_all(&tcon->ses->server->request_q);
> wake_up_all(&tcon->ses->server->response_q);
> - msleep(1); /* yield */
> + fsleep(1000); /* yield */
> /* we have to kick the requests once more */
> wake_up_all(&tcon->ses->server->response_q);
> - msleep(1);
> + fsleep(1000);
> }
>
> return;
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index 44f9cce..62a9c64 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static inline int reconn_setup_dfs_targets(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> if (rc) {
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "reconnect error %d\n", rc);
> mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex);
> - msleep(3000);
> + ssleep(3);
> } else {
> atomic_inc(&tcpSesReconnectCount);
> set_credits(server, 1);
> @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ static inline int reconn_setup_dfs_targets(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> server->bigbuf = (char *)cifs_buf_get();
> if (!server->bigbuf) {
> cifs_server_dbg(VFS, "No memory for large SMB response\n");
> - msleep(3000);
> + ssleep(3);
> /* retry will check if exiting */
> return false;
> }
> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static inline int reconn_setup_dfs_targets(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> server->smallbuf = (char *)cifs_small_buf_get();
> if (!server->smallbuf) {
> cifs_server_dbg(VFS, "No memory for SMB response\n");
> - msleep(1000);
> + ssleep(1);
> /* retry will check if exiting */
> return false;
> }
> @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static inline int reconn_setup_dfs_targets(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> * to clear and app threads to set tcpStatus
> * CifsNeedReconnect if server hung.
> */
> - usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> + fsleep(1000);
> length = 0;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static inline int reconn_setup_dfs_targets(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> */
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "RFC 1002 negative session response\n");
> /* give server a second to clean up */
> - msleep(1000);
> + ssleep(1);
> /*
> * Always try 445 first on reconnect since we get NACK
> * on some if we ever connected to port 139 (the NACK
> @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static void clean_demultiplex_info(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> * response and going ahead and killing cifsd.
> */
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "Wait for exit from demultiplex thread\n");
> - msleep(46000);
> + ssleep(46);
> /*
> * If threads still have not exited they are probably never
> * coming home not much else we can do but free the memory.
> @@ -3655,7 +3655,7 @@ static void rfc1002mangle(char *target, char *source, unsigned int length)
> * significant slowing down on mount
> * for everyone else
> */
> - usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> + fsleep(1000);
> }
> /*
> * else the negprot may still work without this
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index be46fab..75538a8 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int cifs_posix_open(char *full_path, struct inode **pinode,
> cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> while (!down_write_trylock(sem))
> - msleep(10);
> + fsleep(10000);
> }
>
> static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work);
> @@ -2828,7 +2828,7 @@ size_t get_numpages(const size_t wsize, const size_t len, size_t *cur_len)
>
> if (wsize < wdata->bytes) {
> add_credits_and_wake_if(server, &credits, 0);
> - msleep(1000);
> + ssleep(1);
> }
> } while (wsize < wdata->bytes);
> wdata->credits = credits;
> @@ -3563,7 +3563,7 @@ static int cifs_resend_rdata(struct cifs_readdata *rdata,
>
> if (rsize < rdata->bytes) {
> add_credits_and_wake_if(server, &credits, 0);
> - msleep(1000);
> + ssleep(1);
> }
> } while (rsize < rdata->bytes);
> rdata->credits = credits;
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
> index b029ed3..84f97f8 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
> @@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@ void smbd_destroy(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> wake_up_interruptible_all(&info->wait_mr);
> while (atomic_read(&info->mr_used_count)) {
> mutex_unlock(&server->srv_mutex);
> - msleep(1000);
> + ssleep(1);
> mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
> }
> destroy_mr_list(info);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists