[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210106095432.26e5b86d@slackpad.fritz.box>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:54:32 +0000
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: Add support for SMCCC TRNG entropy source
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:00:14 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:36:51PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> > @@ -77,10 +117,20 @@ arch_get_random_seed_long_early(unsigned long
> > *v) {
> > WARN_ON(system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING);
> >
> > - if (!__early_cpu_has_rndr())
> > - return false;
> > + if (__early_cpu_has_rndr())
> > + return __arm64_rndr(v);
> > +
> > + if (smccc_trng_available) {
> > + struct arm_smccc_res res;
>
> This still seems to be preferring RNDR over SMCCC for the early seed
> unless I'm misreading the diff?
Argh, my apologies for that blunder. I *did* change it, but must have
lost it when rebasing against my debug patches.
Will send a fixed version in a jiffy.
Cheers,
Andre.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists