[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210106104126.GC5729@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:41:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/15] x86/paravirt: switch time pvops functions to
use static_call()
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:31:50PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> These Hyper-V changes are problematic as we want to keep hyperv_timer.c
> architecture independent. While only the code for x86/x64 is currently
> accepted upstream, code for ARM64 support is in progress. So we need
> to use hv_setup_sched_clock() in hyperv_timer.c, and have the per-arch
> implementation in mshyperv.h.
Why, because ARM doesn't have static_call yet? I hear someone is working
on that...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists