linux-kernel - Re: [v3 PATCH 09/11] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate shrinker->nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c591313-08fd-4f98-6021-6dfa59f01aff@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:15:07 +0300
From:   Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, guro@...com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
        david@...morbit.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 09/11] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate
 shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers

On 06.01.2021 01:58, Yang Shi wrote:
> Now nr_deferred is available on per memcg level for memcg aware shrinkers, so don't need
> allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for such shrinkers anymore.
> 
> The prealloc_memcg_shrinker() would return -ENOSYS if !CONFIG_MEMCG or memcg is disabled
> by kernel command line, then shrinker's SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE flag would be cleared.
> This makes the implementation of this patch simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index f20ed8e928c2..d9795fb0f1c5 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -340,6 +340,9 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  {
>  	int id, ret = -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> +		return -ENOSYS;
> +
>  	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
>  	/* This may call shrinker, so it must use down_read_trylock() */
>  	id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, SHRINKER_REGISTERING, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -424,7 +427,7 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
>  #else
>  static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	return -ENOSYS;
>  }
>  
>  static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> @@ -535,8 +538,20 @@ unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru, int zone
>   */
>  int prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  {
> -	unsigned int size = sizeof(*shrinker->nr_deferred);
> +	unsigned int size;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) {
> +		err = prealloc_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
> +		if (!err)
> +			return 0;
> +		if (err != -ENOSYS)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;

This looks very confusing.

In case of you want to disable preallocation branch for !MEMCG case,
you should firstly consider something like the below:

#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
#define SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE    (1 << 2)
#else
#define SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE    0
#endif

> +	}
>  
> +	size = sizeof(*shrinker->nr_deferred);
>  	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)
>  		size *= nr_node_ids;
>  
> @@ -544,26 +559,14 @@ int prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  	if (!shrinker->nr_deferred)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) {
> -		if (prealloc_memcg_shrinker(shrinker))
> -			goto free_deferred;
> -	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -
> -free_deferred:
> -	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
> -	shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
> -	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
>  void free_prealloced_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  {
> -	if (!shrinker->nr_deferred)
> -		return;
> -
>  	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
> -		unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
> +		return unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
>  
>  	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
>  	shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
>