linux-kernel - [PATCH V4 2/5] gpio: gpio-xilinx: Reduce spinlock array to array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1609936000-28378-3-git-send-email-srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:56:37 +0530
From:   Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
To:     <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        <michal.simek@...inx.com>, <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>,
        <sgoud@...inx.com>, <hancock@...systems.ca>,
        <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>, <syednwaris@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <git@...inx.com>,
        Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 2/5] gpio: gpio-xilinx: Reduce spinlock array to array

Changed spinlock array to single. It is preparation for irq support which
is shared between two channels that's why spinlock should be only one.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
---
Changes in V4:
-None.
Changes in V3:
-Created new patch for spinlock changes.
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
index d010a63d5d15..f88db56543c2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct xgpio_instance {
 	unsigned int gpio_width[2];
 	u32 gpio_state[2];
 	u32 gpio_dir[2];
-	spinlock_t gpio_lock[2];
+	spinlock_t gpio_lock;	/* For serializing operations */
 	struct clk *clk;
 };
 
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	int index =  xgpio_index(chip, gpio);
 	int offset =  xgpio_offset(chip, gpio);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Write to GPIO signal and set its direction to output */
 	if (val)
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
 		       xgpio_regoffset(chip, gpio), chip->gpio_state[index]);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
 	int index = xgpio_index(chip, 0);
 	int offset, i;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Write to GPIO signals */
 	for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
@@ -155,9 +155,9 @@ static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
 			xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
 				       index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET,
 				       chip->gpio_state[index]);
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 			index =  xgpio_index(chip, i);
-			spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 		}
 		if (__test_and_clear_bit(i, mask)) {
 			offset =  xgpio_offset(chip, i);
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
 	xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
 		       index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -190,14 +190,14 @@ static int xgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
 	int index =  xgpio_index(chip, gpio);
 	int offset =  xgpio_offset(chip, gpio);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Set the GPIO bit in shadow register and set direction as input */
 	chip->gpio_dir[index] |= BIT(offset);
 	xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET +
 		       xgpio_regoffset(chip, gpio), chip->gpio_dir[index]);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int xgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	int index =  xgpio_index(chip, gpio);
 	int offset =  xgpio_offset(chip, gpio);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Write state of GPIO signal */
 	if (val)
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int xgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
 	xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET +
 			xgpio_regoffset(chip, gpio), chip->gpio_dir[index]);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "xlnx,gpio-width", &chip->gpio_width[0]))
 		chip->gpio_width[0] = 32;
 
-	spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[0]);
+	spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock);
 
 	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "xlnx,is-dual", &is_dual))
 		is_dual = 0;
@@ -336,7 +336,6 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 					 &chip->gpio_width[1]))
 			chip->gpio_width[1] = 32;
 
-		spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[1]);
 	}
 
 	chip->gc.base = -1;
-- 
2.7.4