[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/XhFzKo/Gv+bFsx@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:11:03 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: reduce cases for active balance
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:41:04PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Let me try again:
>
> Active balance is triggered for a number of voluntary cases like
> misfit or pinned tasks cases but also after that a number of load
> balance attempts failed to migrate a task. There is no need to use
> active load balance when the group is overloaded because an overloaded
> state means that there is at least one waiting task. Nevertheless, the
> waiting task is not selected and detached until the threshold becomes
> higher than its load. This threshold increases with the number of
> failed lb (see the condition if ((load >> env->sd->nr_balance_failed)
> > env->imbalance) in detach_tasks()) and the waiting task will end up
> to be selected after a number of attempts.
Ah, makes sense now. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists