linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:52:41 -0500
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:     Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        paulus@...ba.org, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        frowand.list@...il.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
        jgross@...e.com, sstabellini@...nel.org, hch@....de,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        grant.likely@....com, xypron.glpk@....de, treding@...dia.com,
        mingo@...nel.org, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, saravanak@...gle.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, tfiga@...omium.org,
        drinkcat@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool

Hello!

In this file:

> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index e4368159f88a..7fb2ac087d23 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
..

> +static const struct reserved_mem_ops rmem_swiotlb_ops = {
> +	.device_init	= rmem_swiotlb_device_init,
> +	.device_release	= rmem_swiotlb_device_release,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init rmem_swiotlb_setup(struct reserved_mem *rmem)
> +{
> +	unsigned long node = rmem->fdt_node;
> +
> +	if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reusable", NULL) ||
> +	    of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,cma-default", NULL) ||
> +	    of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,dma-default", NULL) ||
> +	    of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "no-map", NULL))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rmem->ops = &rmem_swiotlb_ops;
> +	pr_info("Reserved memory: created device swiotlb memory pool at %pa, size %ld MiB\n",
> +		&rmem->base, (unsigned long)rmem->size / SZ_1M);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +RESERVEDMEM_OF_DECLARE(dma, "restricted-dma-pool", rmem_swiotlb_setup);

The code should be as much as possible arch-agnostic. That is why there
are multiple -swiotlb files scattered in arch directories that own the
architecture specific code.

Would it be possible to move the code there and perhaps have a ARM
specific front-end for this DMA restricted pool there? See for example
the xen-swiotlb code.

Cheers!

Konrad