[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <697467.1609962267@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 19:44:27 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
natechancellor@...il.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: fix handling of an unsupported token type in rxrpc_read()
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
> These two loops iterate over the same data, i believe returning here is all
> that is needed.
But if the first loop is made to support a new type, but the second loop is
missed, it will then likely oops. Besides, the compiler should optimise both
paths together.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists