linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ubsan: disable unsigned-integer-overflow sanitizer with clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210107181547.GA436377@ubuntu-m3-large-x86>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:15:47 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        George Popescu <georgepope@...roid.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubsan: disable unsigned-integer-overflow sanitizer with
 clang

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:22:00AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:09:59PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 11:12 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:57 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 04:47:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> > > > > index 8b635fd75fe4..e23873282ba7 100644
> > > > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> > > > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> > > > > @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ config UBSAN_SIGNED_OVERFLOW
> > > > >
> > > > >  config UBSAN_UNSIGNED_OVERFLOW
> > > > >       bool "Perform checking for unsigned arithmetic overflow"
> > > > > +     # clang hugely expands stack usage with -fsanitize=object-size
> > > > > +     depends on !CC_IS_CLANG
> > > > >       depends on $(cc-option,-fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow)
> > > >
> > > > Because of Clang implementation issues (see commit c637693b20da), this is
> > > > already "default n" (and not supported under GCC at all). IIUC, setting
> > > > this to "depends on !COMPILE_TEST" won't work for randconfigs, yes?
> > >
> > > Ah, I had not realized this is clang specific. Adding the !COMPILE_TEST
> > > dependency would hide it for me, which may be good enough for me.
> > >
> > > > Is there some better way to mark this as "known to have issues, please
> > > > don't include in randconfig?"
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to keep it around so people can continue to work out the
> > > > problems with it, but not have unexpecting folks trip over it. ;)
> > >
> > > I've reverted that patch locally now and default-enabled for randconfigs.
> > > Now that I have an otherwise clean build, this should provide me
> > > with a full set of files that produce the warning. If the number is
> > > small enough, I could try opening individual github issues.
> > 
> > A day's worth of randconfig builds with clang-11 or clang-12 shows these
> > instances that exceeded the warning limit:
> > 
> > crypto/blake2b_generic.c:98:13: error: stack frame size of 9636 bytes
> > in function 'blake2b_compress' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > crypto/sha512_generic.c:151:13: error: stack frame size of 1292 bytes
> > in function 'sha512_generic_block_fn' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > lib/crypto/curve25519-fiat32.c:312:22: error: stack frame size of 2180
> > bytes in function 'fe_mul_impl' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > lib/crypto/curve25519-fiat32.c:444:22: error: stack frame size of 1588
> > bytes in function 'fe_sqr_impl' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > fs/btrfs/scrub.c:3028:31: error: stack frame size of 1132 bytes in
> > function 'scrub_stripe' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3590:6: warning: stack
> > frame size of 1100 bytes in function 'e1000_update_stats'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c:11829:13: warning: stack frame
> > size of 1188 bytes in function 'tg3_get_estats' [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6551:6: warning: stack frame
> > size of 1348 bytes in function 'igb_update_stats'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c:3608:6: warning: stack frame
> > size of 1124 bytes in function 'igc_update_stats'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_l2.c:1759:1: warning: stack frame
> > size of 1300 bytes in function '__qed_get_vport_port_stats'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:7022:6: warning: stack
> > frame size of 1564 bytes in function 'ixgbe_update_stats'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c:1590:1: warning: stack
> > frame size of 1140 bytes in function 'ixgb_update_stats'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib/ipoib.c:145:6: warning:
> > stack frame size of 1068 bytes in function 'mlx5i_get_stats'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c:5600:5: warning: stack
> > frame size of 1052 bytes in function 'atomisp_set_fmt'
> > [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > 
> > All of these *only* happen on 32-bit x86, and can be reproduced in a
> > i386_defconfig, with the corresponding drivers (btrfs, sha512, blake2b,
> > curve25519, and the ethernet ones) and UBSAN_UNSIGNED_OVERFLOW
> > manually enabled. Given that few people still care about i386, maybe
> > we could just make the option depend on !CONFIG_X86_32
> 
> I'm fine with that -- or maybe any 32-bit architecture, if the problem
> is poor stack space optimization on 32-bit archs?
> 
> > 
> > That config also runs into two more BUILD_BUG_ON() that I had not
> > seen in randconfig tests:
> > 
> > (i386 defconfig plus ubsan)
> > ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __compiletime_assert_207
> > >>> referenced by cpu_entry_area.c
> > >>>               mm/cpu_entry_area.o:(setup_cpu_entry_area_ptes) in archive arch/x86/built-in.a
> 
> That one I don't think I've seen before.
> 
> > 
> > (x86-64 defconfig plus ubsan)
> > ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __compiletime_assert_362
> > >>> referenced by efi_64.c
> > >>>               platform/efi/efi_64.o:(efi_sync_low_kernel_mappings) in archive arch/x86/built-in.a
> 
> I think this is:
> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/256
> and that bug needs re-opening? Or maybe there's a new bug I can't find?

The problem is that applying the fix for that issue does not work, nor
does converting p4d_index to a macro like mips and s390. I am not sure
what exactly is going on there, it appears that clang cannot reason
about ptrs_per_p4d because it is an extern variable with no assigned
value in its translation unit?

Cheers,
Nathan