linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6740994.gz1i9f73Yi@kreacher>
Date:   Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:44:18 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rename two functions

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Rename intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp() and intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl()
to intel_cpufreq_hwp_update() and intel_cpufreq_perf_ctl_update(),
respectively, to avoid possible confusion with the ->adjist_perf()
callback function, intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_trace(struct c
 		fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100));
 }
 
-static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(struct cpudata *cpu, u32 min, u32 max,
+static void intel_cpufreq_hwp_update(struct cpudata *cpu, u32 min, u32 max,
 				     u32 desired, bool fast_switch)
 {
 	u64 prev = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached), value = prev;
@@ -2551,7 +2551,7 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(str
 		wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value);
 }
 
-static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl(struct cpudata *cpu,
+static void intel_cpufreq_perf_ctl_update(struct cpudata *cpu,
 					  u32 target_pstate, bool fast_switch)
 {
 	if (fast_switch)
@@ -2573,10 +2573,10 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_update_pstate(s
 		int max_pstate = policy->strict_target ?
 					target_pstate : cpu->max_perf_ratio;
 
-		intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(cpu, target_pstate, max_pstate, 0,
+		intel_cpufreq_hwp_update(cpu, target_pstate, max_pstate, 0,
 					 fast_switch);
 	} else if (target_pstate != old_pstate) {
-		intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf_ctl(cpu, target_pstate, fast_switch);
+		intel_cpufreq_perf_ctl_update(cpu, target_pstate, fast_switch);
 	}
 
 	cpu->pstate.current_pstate = target_pstate;
@@ -2674,7 +2674,7 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf(un
 
 	target_pstate = clamp_t(int, target_pstate, min_pstate, max_pstate);
 
-	intel_cpufreq_adjust_hwp(cpu, min_pstate, max_pstate, target_pstate, true);
+	intel_cpufreq_hwp_update(cpu, min_pstate, max_pstate, target_pstate, true);
 
 	cpu->pstate.current_pstate = target_pstate;
 	intel_cpufreq_trace(cpu, INTEL_PSTATE_TRACE_FAST_SWITCH, old_pstate);