linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Always read hwp_cap_cached with READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1993550.StjdRojnlU@kreacher>
Date:   Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:42:15 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Always read hwp_cap_cached with READ_ONCE()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Because intel_pstate_get_hwp_max() which updates hwp_cap_cached
may run in parallel with the readers of it, annotate all of the
read accesses to it with READ_ONCE().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_offline(str
 	}
 
 	value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 0);
-	min_perf = HWP_LOWEST_PERF(cpu->hwp_cap_cached);
+	min_perf = HWP_LOWEST_PERF(READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_cap_cached));
 
 	/* Set hwp_max = hwp_min */
 	value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(min_perf);
@@ -1750,6 +1750,7 @@ static int hwp_boost_hold_time_ns = 3 *
 static inline void intel_pstate_hwp_boost_up(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
 	u64 hwp_req = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_req_cached);
+	u64 hwp_cap = READ_ONCE(cpu->hwp_cap_cached);
 	u32 max_limit = (hwp_req & 0xff00) >> 8;
 	u32 min_limit = (hwp_req & 0xff);
 	u32 boost_level1;
@@ -1776,14 +1777,14 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_hwp_boos
 		cpu->hwp_boost_min = min_limit;
 
 	/* level at half way mark between min and guranteed */
-	boost_level1 = (HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(cpu->hwp_cap_cached) + min_limit) >> 1;
+	boost_level1 = (HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(hwp_cap) + min_limit) >> 1;
 
 	if (cpu->hwp_boost_min < boost_level1)
 		cpu->hwp_boost_min = boost_level1;
-	else if (cpu->hwp_boost_min < HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(cpu->hwp_cap_cached))
-		cpu->hwp_boost_min = HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(cpu->hwp_cap_cached);
-	else if (cpu->hwp_boost_min == HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(cpu->hwp_cap_cached) &&
-		 max_limit != HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(cpu->hwp_cap_cached))
+	else if (cpu->hwp_boost_min < HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(hwp_cap))
+		cpu->hwp_boost_min = HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(hwp_cap);
+	else if (cpu->hwp_boost_min == HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(hwp_cap) &&
+		 max_limit != HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF(hwp_cap))
 		cpu->hwp_boost_min = max_limit;
 	else
 		return;