[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whg-91=EF=8=ayyDQGx_3iuWKp3aHUkDCDkgUb15Yh8AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:17:40 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: soft_dirty: userfaultfd: introduce wrprotect_tlb_flush_pending
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:04 PM Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> However there are two cases that could wrprotecting exclusive anon
> pages with only the mmap_read_lock:
I still think the real fix is "Don't do that then", and just take the
write lock.
The UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT case simply isn't that critical. It's not a
normal operation. Same goes for softdirty.
Why have those become _so_ magical that they can break the VM for
everybody else?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists