linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] scsi: ufs: handle LINERESET with correct tm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <163fae07a94933230e0432e2ca584040@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:38:53 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] scsi: ufs: handle LINERESET with correct tm_cmd

On 2021-01-07 05:41, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
> 
> This fixes a warning caused by wrong reserve tag usage in 
> __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd.
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 7 at block/blk-core.c:630 
> blk_get_request+0x68/0x70
> WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 157 at block/blk-mq-tag.c:82 
> blk_mq_get_tag+0x438/0x46c
> 
> And, in ufshcd_err_handler(), we can avoid to send tm_cmd before 
> aborting
> outstanding commands by waiting a bit for IO completion like this.
> 
> __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd: task management cmd 0x80 timed-out
> 

Would you mind add a Fixes tag?

> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 1678cec08b51..47fc8da3cbf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
>  /* Query request timeout */
>  #define QUERY_REQ_TIMEOUT 1500 /* 1.5 seconds */
> 
> +/* LINERESET TIME OUT */
> +#define LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS			(30000) /* 30 sec */
> +
>  /* Task management command timeout */
>  #define TM_CMD_TIMEOUT	100 /* msecs */
> 
> @@ -5899,6 +5902,8 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>  	 * check if power mode restore is needed.
>  	 */
>  	if (hba->saved_uic_err & UFSHCD_UIC_PA_GENERIC_ERROR) {
> +		ktime_t start = ktime_get();
> +
>  		hba->saved_uic_err &= ~UFSHCD_UIC_PA_GENERIC_ERROR;
>  		if (!hba->saved_uic_err)
>  			hba->saved_err &= ~UIC_ERROR;
> @@ -5906,6 +5911,20 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>  		if (ufshcd_is_pwr_mode_restore_needed(hba))
>  			needs_restore = true;
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +		/* Wait for IO completion to avoid aborting IOs */
> +		while (hba->outstanding_reqs) {
> +			ufshcd_complete_requests(hba);
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +			schedule();
> +			spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +			if (ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)) >
> +						LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS) {
> +				dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: timeout, outstanding=0x%lx\n",
> +					__func__, hba->outstanding_reqs);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
>  		if (!hba->saved_err && !needs_restore)
>  			goto skip_err_handling;
>  	}
> @@ -6302,9 +6321,13 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void 
> *__hba)
>  		intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
>  	}
> 
> -	if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE) {
> -		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x\n",
> -					__func__, intr_status);
> +	if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE &&
> +				!ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)) {
> +		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x (0x%08x, 
> 0x%08x)\n",
> +					__func__,
> +					intr_status,
> +					hba->ufs_stats.last_intr_status,
> +					enabled_intr_status);
>  		ufshcd_dump_regs(hba, 0, UFSHCI_REG_SPACE_SIZE, "host_regs: ");
>  	}
> 
> @@ -6348,7 +6371,11 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba 
> *hba,
>  	 * Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely,
>  	 * the maximum wait time is bounded by %TM_CMD_TIMEOUT.
>  	 */
> -	req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED);
> +	req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED |
> +						BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT);

Sorry that I didn't pay much attention to this part of code before.
May I know why must we use the BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED flag?

Thanks,
Can Guo.

> +	if (IS_ERR(req))
> +		return PTR_ERR(req);
> +
>  	req->end_io_data = &wait;
>  	free_slot = req->tag;
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(free_slot < 0 || free_slot >= hba->nutmrs);
> @@ -9355,6 +9382,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
> __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> 
>  	hba->tmf_tag_set = (struct blk_mq_tag_set) {
>  		.nr_hw_queues	= 1,
> +		.reserved_tags	= 1,

If we give reserved_tags as 1 and always ask for a tm requst with
BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED flag set, then the tag shall only be allocated
from the reserved sbitmap_queue, whose depth is set to 1 here.
UFS supports tm queue depth as 8, but here is allowing only one tm
req at a time. Why? Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.

Thanks,
Can Guo.

>  		.queue_depth	= hba->nutmrs,
>  		.ops		= &ufshcd_tmf_ops,
>  		.flags		= BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED,