[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210107.101729.1936921832901251107.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:17:29 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: geert@...ux-m68k.org
Cc: tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, mpm@...enic.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
vkoul@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, kuba@...nel.org,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
broonie@...nel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:41:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > Is that sufficient to keep it?
>>
>> for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then...
>
> Indeed. Fortunately not all of it, as some removals were TX4938-only.
These patches should not break RBTX4927:
net: tc35815: Drop support for TX49XX boards
spi: txx9: Remove driver
mtd: Remove drivers used by TX49xx
char: hw_random: Remove tx4939 driver
rtc: tx4939: Remove driver
ide: tx4938ide: Remove driver
And these patches just break audio-support only.
dma: tx49 removal
ASoC: txx9: Remove driver
I think dma and ASoC drivers are hard to maintain now, and can be
dropped for basic support for RBTX4927.
(TX39 boards does not have audio-support, so dma txx9 driver can be
dropped too)
---
Atsushi Nemoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists