[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda4AupiD2mkuYzmJTcq9nVVNUbo4KzyMQXUokFLxgp+Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:14:40 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>,
sgoud@...inx.com, Robert Hancock <hancock@...systems.ca>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
git@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/5] gpio: gpio-xilinx: Reduce spinlock array to array
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:27 PM Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com> wrote:
> Changed spinlock array to single. It is preparation for irq support which
> is shared between two channels that's why spinlock should be only one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists