linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: migrate: do not migrate HugeTLB page whose refcount is one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:16:42 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: migrate: do not migrate
 HugeTLB page whose refcount is one

On Thu 07-01-21 10:52:21, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:13 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 06-01-21 16:47:34, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > If the refcount is one when it is migrated, it means that the page
> > > was freed from under us. So we are done and do not need to migrate.
> >
> > Is this common enough that it would warrant the explicit check for each
> > migration?
> 
> Are you worried about the overhead caused by the check? Thanks.

I am not as worried as I would like to see some actual justification for
this optimization.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs