[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2101071303040.864696@eliteleevi.tm.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 13:45:55 +0200 (EET)
From: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
cc: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: avoid reverse module dependency
Hi Arnd,
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:07 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Change it to use the normal probe order of starting with a specific
> > device in a driver, turning the sof-acpi-dev.c driver into a library.
>
> There were a couple of build failures introduced by this version. I have
> one that does build now, and can post that if others think this is the
> direction they want to go.
thanks for the follow-up. We have many SOF maintainers still out on
holidays this week, so let's give some time for people to digest. This is
certainly a big change. The version you posted is already sufficient to
describe the idea for sure.
Br, Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists