[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gSCpZ6O+o7uXQKyQN+xOWhQSjiRqdqSdkez=ZsgCaOjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:50:51 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] IdeaPad platform profile support
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:17 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 1/5/21 6:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 9:58 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >> Patch 1/2 does use a slightly different approach then I suggest above,
> >> thinking more about this it would be cleaner IMHO to just pass the
> >> cur_profile pointer to the callbacks as the pseudo-code patch which I
> >> wrote above does. Drivers which use globals can then just ignore
> >> the extra argument (and keep the platform_profile_handler struct const)
> >> where as drivers which use dynamic allocation can embed the struct in
> >> their driver's data-struct.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> Note that Jiaxun has provided a v2 of this patch-set with patch 1/2 implementing
> the new approach.
>
> Can you merge merge that patch please and then once you're happy that this
> has seen enough exposure in -next, provide me with an immutable branch with
> the 3 platform-profile patches in it ?
I will, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists