linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC cpumask 4/5] cpumask: Add "last" alias for cpu list specifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210107153244.GL2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 07:32:44 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team@...com, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC cpumask 4/5] cpumask: Add "last" alias for cpu list
 specifications

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:59:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:47:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > I don't really see the use of the ranges thing, CPU enumeration just
> > > isn't sane like that. Also, I should really add that randomization pass
> > > to the CPU enumeration :-)
> > 
> > Please don't!!!
> 
> Why not, the BIOS more or less already does that on a per machine basis
> anyway. Doing it per boot just makes things more reliably screwy ;-)

Fixing BIOS would be much more productive, now wouldn't it?

							Thanx, Paul