lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:01:11 +0800
From:   Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change
 intel_pstate_get_hwp_max() argument

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:43:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> All of the callers of intel_pstate_get_hwp_max() access the struct
> cpudata object that corresponds to the given CPU already and the
> function itself needs to access that object (in order to update
> hwp_cap_cached), so modify the code to pass a struct cpudata pointer
> to it instead of the CPU number.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
 Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>


 thanks,
 Chenyu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists