[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/gN9godW5uiBtB7@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:47:02 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, arnd@...db.de, lee.jones@...aro.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
trix@...hat.com, lgoncalv@...hat.com, hao.wu@...el.com,
matthew.gerlach@...el.com, russell.h.weight@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] misc: add support for retimers interfaces on
Intel MAX 10 BMC
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:05:26AM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:26:12AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:07:08PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > > This driver supports the ethernet retimers (C827) for the Intel PAC
> > > (Programmable Acceleration Card) N3000, which is a FPGA based Smart NIC.
> > >
> > > C827 is an Intel(R) Ethernet serdes transceiver chip that supports
> > > up to 100G transfer. On Intel PAC N3000 there are 2 C827 chips
> > > managed by the Intel MAX 10 BMC firmware. They are configured in 4 ports
> > > 10G/25G retimer mode. Host could query their link states and firmware
> > > version information via retimer interfaces (Shared registers) on Intel
> > > MAX 10 BMC. The driver creates sysfs interfaces for users to query these
> > > information.
> >
> > Networking people, please look at this sysfs file:
> >
> > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/n3000bmc-retimer.*.auto/link_statusX
> > > +Date: Jan 2021
> > > +KernelVersion: 5.12
> > > +Contact: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
> > > +Description: Read only. Returns the status of each line side link. "1" for
> > > + link up, "0" for link down.
> > > + Format: "%u".
> >
> > as I need your approval to add it because it is not the "normal" way for
> > link status to be exported to userspace.
> >
> > One code issue:
> >
> > > +#define to_link_attr(dev_attr) \
> > > + container_of(dev_attr, struct link_attr, attr)
> > > +
> > > +static ssize_t
> > > +link_status_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > > +{
> > > + struct m10bmc_retimer *retimer = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > + struct link_attr *lattr = to_link_attr(attr);
> > > + unsigned int val;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = m10bmc_sys_read(retimer->m10bmc, M10BMC_PKVL_LSTATUS, &val);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n",
> > > + !!(val & BIT((retimer->id << 2) + lattr->index)));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#define link_status_attr(_index) \
> > > + static struct link_attr link_attr_status##_index = \
> > > + { .attr = __ATTR(link_status##_index, 0444, \
> > > + link_status_show, NULL), \
> > > + .index = (_index) }
> >
> > Why is this a "raw" attribute and not a device attribute?
>
> It is actually a device_attribute. The device_attribute is embedded in
> link_attr, like:
>
> struct link_attr {
> struct device_attribute attr;
> u32 index;
> };
>
> An index for the link is appended along with the device_attribute, so we
> could identify which link is being queried on link_status_show(). There
> are 4 links and this is to avoid duplicated code like
> link_status_1_show(), link_status_2_show() ...
Duplicated code is better to read than complex code :)
> > Please just use a normal DEVICE_ATTR_RO() macro to make it simpler and
>
> DEVICE_ATTR_RO() is to define a standalone device_attribute variable, but
> here we are initializing a field in struct link_attr.
Then use the correct initialization macro that is given to you for that,
do not roll your own.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists