lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Message-ID: <20210108080521.dzm2gczd3d2ygb5y@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 09:05:21 +0100
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Kevin Paul Herbert <kph@...tinasystems.com>
Cc:     biwen.li@....com, leoyang.li@....com, linux@...pel-privat.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, wsa@...-dreams.de, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, aisheng.dong@....com,
        xiaoning.wang@....com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiafei.pan@....com,
        xiaobo.xie@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        biwen.li@....nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-imx.c: Synthesize end of transaction events without
 idle interrupts

Hi Kevin Paul,

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:48:50AM -0800, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote:
> Only the Layerscape SoCs have interrupts on bus idle, which facilitate
> sending events which complete slave bus transactions.
> 
> Add support for synthesizing missing events. If we see a master request,
> or a newly addressed slave request, if the last event sent to the backend
> was I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, send the backend a I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED
> followed by I2C_SLAVE_STOP. For all other events, send an I2C_SLAVE_STOP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Paul Herbert <kph@...tinasystems.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> index b444fbf1a262..b3e2a6a7fc19 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ struct imx_i2c_struct {
>  
>  	struct imx_i2c_dma	*dma;
>  	struct i2c_client	*slave;
> +	enum i2c_slave_event last_slave_event;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx1_i2c_hwdata = {
> @@ -662,6 +663,36 @@ static void i2c_imx_enable_bus_idle(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void i2c_imx_slave_event(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
> +				enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
> +{
> +	i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, event, val);
> +	i2c_imx->last_slave_event = event;
> +}
> +
> +static void i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
> +{
> +	u8 val;
> +
> +	while (i2c_imx->last_slave_event != I2C_SLAVE_STOP) {
> +		switch (i2c_imx->last_slave_event) {
> +		case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
> +			i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED,
> +					    &val);
> +			break;
> +
> +		case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
> +		case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
> +		case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
> +			i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &val);
> +			break;
> +
> +		case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}

Is it really working code?

The i2c_imx_slave_finish_op() is a waiting busy loop withing an IRQ! And
it is waiting for an event, which is updated in the same IRQ callback.
Or am i missing some thing?

Regards,
Oleksij

>  static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>  				     unsigned int status, unsigned int ctl)
>  {
> @@ -674,9 +705,11 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (status & I2SR_IAAS) { /* Addressed as a slave */
> +		i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(i2c_imx);
>  		if (status & I2SR_SRW) { /* Master wants to read from us*/
>  			dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev, "read requested");
> -			i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value);
> +			i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> +					    I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value);
>  
>  			/* Slave transmit */
>  			ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
> @@ -686,7 +719,8 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>  			imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
>  		} else { /* Master wants to write to us */
>  			dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev, "write requested");
> -			i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave,	I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, &value);
> +			i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> +					    I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, &value);
>  
>  			/* Slave receive */
>  			ctl &= ~I2CR_MTX;
> @@ -697,17 +731,20 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_slave_isr(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>  	} else if (!(ctl & I2CR_MTX)) { /* Receive mode */
>  		if (status & I2SR_IBB) { /* No STOP signal detected */
>  			value = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
> -			i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave,	I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, &value);
> +			i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> +					    I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, &value);
>  		} else { /* STOP signal is detected */
>  			dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev,
>  				"STOP signal detected");
> -			i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &value);
> +			i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> +					    I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &value);
>  		}
>  	} else if (!(status & I2SR_RXAK)) { /* Transmit mode received ACK */
>  		ctl |= I2CR_MTX;
>  		imx_i2c_write_reg(ctl, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR);
>  
> -		i2c_slave_event(i2c_imx->slave,	I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, &value);
> +		i2c_imx_slave_event(i2c_imx,
> +				    I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, &value);
>  
>  		imx_i2c_write_reg(value, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2DR);
>  	} else { /* Transmit mode received NAK */
> @@ -748,6 +785,7 @@ static int i2c_imx_reg_slave(struct i2c_client *client)
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
>  	i2c_imx->slave = client;
> +	i2c_imx->last_slave_event = I2C_SLAVE_STOP;
>  
>  	/* Resume */
>  	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(i2c_imx->adapter.dev.parent);
> @@ -800,10 +838,17 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_imx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  
>  	status = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR);
>  	ctl = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR);
> +
>  	if (status & I2SR_IIF) {
>  		i2c_imx_clear_irq(i2c_imx, I2SR_IIF);
> -		if (i2c_imx->slave && !(ctl & I2CR_MSTA))
> -			return i2c_imx_slave_isr(i2c_imx, status, ctl);
> +		if (i2c_imx->slave) {
> +			if (!(ctl & I2CR_MSTA)) {
> +				return i2c_imx_slave_isr(i2c_imx, status, ctl);
> +			} else if (i2c_imx->last_slave_event !=
> +				   I2C_SLAVE_STOP) {
> +				i2c_imx_slave_finish_op(i2c_imx);
> +			}
> +		}
>  		return i2c_imx_master_isr(i2c_imx, status);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ