linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] sched/fair: reduce cases for active balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDhyD2qzjmSGJSsnQwv2M7KSbFhFYkkKUJ0rmvJx632vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 09:11:34 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] sched/fair: reduce cases for active balance

On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 18:40, Valentin Schneider
<valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
>
> On 07/01/21 13:20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 12:26, Valentin Schneider
> > <valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
> >> > @@ -9499,13 +9499,32 @@ asym_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
> >> >  }
> >> >
> >> >  static inline bool
> >> > -voluntary_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
> >> > +imbalanced_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
> >> > +{
> >> > +     struct sched_domain *sd = env->sd;
> >> > +
> >> > +     /*
> >> > +      * The imbalanced case includes the case of pinned tasks preventing a fair
> >> > +      * distribution of the load on the system but also the even distribution of the
> >> > +      * threads on a system with spare capacity
> >> > +      */
> >>
> >> Do you mean s/imbalanced/migrate_task/? This part here will affect
> >> group_imbalanced, group_asym_packing, and some others.
> >
> > I really mean the imbalanced case which refers to the function name
> > and includes:
> > - the pinned tasks case aka group_imbalanced and which is the primary
> > target of this function ( which explains its name)
> > - but also the case where we want to evenly spread tasks on system
> > with spare capacity and removed this imbalance
> >
>
> But can't this also affect other group_types? calculate_imbalance() can
> set
>
>   env->migration_type = migrate_task;
>
> for
>
>   busiest->group_type > group_fully_busy

yes but we are still in the case of evenly spread tasks on system with
spare capacity. Also, this is already the behavior for such cases.