[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a37aaa3bd4d2b032f45cbab998943e6a7f5c086.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:17:32 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
(drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o)
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 10:03 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:55 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On 1/6/21 7:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Changes since 20210106:
> > >
> >
> > on x86_64:
> >
> > ld: drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o: in function `imx_pd_connector_get_modes':
> > parallel-display.c:(.text+0x8d): undefined reference to `of_get_drm_display_mode'
>
> Probably something in the pull from philipp that I just merged
> yesterday.
That is likely, although I'm not quite sure how that activated, the
of_get_drm_display_mode call was there before.
> Philip, can you pls take care?
> -Daniel
Thank you for the notice, since the of_get_drm_display_mode() is only
for legacy device trees I'd like to stub it out and keep compile test
coverage:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210108101343.23695-1-p.zabel@pengutronix.de/T/#u
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists