Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 17:19:31 -0800
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Fix device link device name collision

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:22 PM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
>
> Am 2021-01-08 00:39, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:56 AM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Saravana,
> >>
> >> Am 2021-01-07 00:26, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> >> > The device link device's name was of the form:
> >> > <supplier-dev-name>--<consumer-dev-name>
> >> >
> >> > This can cause name collision as reported here [1] as device names are
> >> > not globally unique. Since device names have to be unique within the
> >> > bus/class, add the bus/class name as a prefix to the device names used
> >> > to
> >> > construct the device link device name.
> >> >
> >> > So the devuce link device's name will be of the form:
> >> > <supplier-bus-name>:<supplier-dev-name>--<consumer-bus-name><consumer-dev-name>
> >> >
> >> > [1] -
> >> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201229033440.32142-1-michael@walle.cc/
> >> > Reported-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> >>
> >> missing Fixes: tag?
> >>
> >> > Can you please test this? This should fix your issue.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, not:
> >>
> >> [    4.234617] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.0: Adding to iommu group 1
> >> [    4.346768] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0400 -> 0402)
> >> [    4.353012] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.0: no MAC address specified for
> >> SI1,
> >> using 3e:6a:a1:57:9c:b0
> >> [    4.361580] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.0: no MAC address specified for
> >> SI2,
> >> using 9e:8b:7b:e3:e2:ad
> >> [    4.370539] libphy: Freescale ENETC MDIO Bus: probed
> >> [    4.376751] libphy: Freescale ENETC internal MDIO Bus: probed
> >> [    4.383060] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.1: Adding to iommu group 2
> >> [    4.494764] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.1: enabling device (0400 -> 0402)
> >> [    4.501012] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.1: no MAC address specified for
> >> SI1,
> >> using ee:99:cb:b1:24:4c
> >> [    4.509580] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.1: no MAC address specified for
> >> SI2,
> >> using 66:60:f4:0d:9e:e0
> >> [    4.518556] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
> >> '/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/consumer:0000:00:00.1'
> >> [    4.530882] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
> >> 5.11.0-rc2-next-20210107-00017-g392ec8cbdef5 #303
> >> [    4.540317] Hardware name: Kontron KBox A-230-LS (DT)
> >> [    4.545385] Call trace:
> >> [    4.547834]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b8
> >> [    4.551517]  show_stack+0x20/0x70
> >> [    4.554844]  dump_stack+0xd8/0x134
> >> [    4.558258]  sysfs_warn_dup+0x6c/0x88
> >> [    4.561932]  sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.2+0x10c/0x110
> >> [    4.567175]  sysfs_create_link+0x2c/0x50
> >> [    4.571109]  devlink_add_symlinks+0x110/0x1b8
> >> [    4.575484]  device_add+0x460/0x798
> >> [    4.578982]  device_link_add+0x46c/0x628
> >> [    4.582917]  fw_devlink_create_devlink+0xb8/0xc8
> >> [    4.587549]  __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x84/0x180
> >> [    4.592705]  __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x134/0x180
> >> [    4.597948]  device_add+0x778/0x798
> >> [    4.601445]  device_register+0x28/0x38
> >> [    4.605205]  __mdiobus_register+0x94/0x340
> >> [    4.609317]  of_mdiobus_register+0xb4/0x380
> >> [    4.613513]  enetc_pf_probe+0x73c/0xb10
> >> [    4.617362]  local_pci_probe+0x48/0xb8
> >> [    4.621125]  pci_device_probe+0x120/0x1c0
> >> [    4.625146]  really_probe+0xec/0x3c0
> >> [    4.628732]  driver_probe_device+0x60/0xc0
> >> [    4.632842]  device_driver_attach+0x7c/0x88
> >> [    4.637039]  __driver_attach+0x60/0xe8
> >> [    4.640799]  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd0
> >> [    4.644647]  driver_attach+0x2c/0x38
> >> [    4.648232]  bus_add_driver+0x194/0x1f8
> >> [    4.652079]  driver_register+0x6c/0x128
> >> [    4.655927]  __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0x58
> >> [    4.660213]  enetc_pf_driver_init+0x2c/0x38
> >> [    4.664412]  do_one_initcall+0x54/0x2d8
> >> [    4.668260]  kernel_init_freeable+0x200/0x26c
> >> [    4.672631]  kernel_init+0x1c/0x120
> >> [    4.676131]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30
> >> [    4.679758] libphy: Freescale ENETC MDIO Bus: probed
> >> [    4.686590] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2: Adding to iommu group 3
> >> [    4.798764] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2: enabling device (0400 -> 0402)
> >> [    4.805010] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.2: no MAC address specified for
> >> SI0,
> >> using 2a:90:8e:f9:ee:5d
> >> [    4.814279] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.6: Adding to iommu group 4
> >> [    4.819992] fsl_enetc 0000:00:00.6: device is disabled, skipping
> >> [    4.826146] fsl_enetc_mdio 0000:00:00.3: Adding to iommu group 5
> >> [    4.938764] fsl_enetc_mdio 0000:00:00.3: enabling device (0400 ->
> >> 0402)
> >> [    4.945601] libphy: FSL PCIe IE Central MDIO Bus: probed
> >>
> >> Please note the:
> >> [    4.518556] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
> >> '/devices/platform/soc/1f0000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.1/consumer:0000:00:00.1'
> >>
> >> Your patch just addresses the link names, but not the ones for
> >> "consumer:"
> >> and "supplier:" under the device itself, right?
> >
> > Ah, this is another location where I needed to fix the collision. Will
> > send out a v2.
> >
> >> > Having said that, do you have some local DT changes when you are
> >> > testing
> >> > this?
> >>
> >> No. But keep in mind that this is also PCI and there might be other
> >> devices too.
> >
> > Right, but fw_devlink is only parsing DT to figure out the
> > dependencies. So I'm confused where these dependencies are inferred
> > from DT. I did check all the DT includes, but it's hard to tell if you
> > have downstream changes or if I'm missing something. Looks like the
> > mdio bus or one of its children is dependent on both the mdio bus node
> > AND the PCI root node. Do you know which one that might be? Can you
> > point to it in DT?
>
> Sorry, I'm not familiar with that whole devlink thing. But one thing
> I noticed is, that it only seems to happen with the following device
> tree:
>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-kontron-kbox-a-230-ls.dts
> and not with:
>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-kontron-sl28-var3-ads2.dts
>
> The difference here is that on the latter the second enetc is not
> enabled (pci dev 0000:00:00.1).
>
> And in the log I've sent you in the v2 thread I've noticed that the
> filenames seem to be truncated:
>
> [   10.875402] platform 2000000.i2c:sl28cpld@4a:gpio@10: Linked as a
> sync state only consumer to 2310000.gpio
> [   10.890943] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
> '/devices/platform/soc/2310000.gpio/consumer:platform:2000000.i2c:sl28cpld@4'
>
> Shouldn't this be
> "/devices/platform/soc/2310000.gpio/consumer:platform:2000000.i2c:sl28cpld@4a:gpio@10
> ?

Good catch regarding the truncation. *face palm* v3 it is. Hopefully
that catches all the issues, but I'm not too confident it will. I'll
send out v3 now just to get it tested out quickly.

-Saravana

Powered by blists - more mailing lists