[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/hnF0W+TMj36LDN@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:07:19 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@...edance.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, pbonzini@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] misc: pvpanic: introduce module parameter 'events'
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 09:52:23PM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> Suggested by Paolo, add a module parameter that can be used to limit
> which capabilities the driver uses.
>
> Finally, the pvpanic guest driver works by the limitation of both
> device capability and user setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@...edance.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/pvpanic.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c b/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c
> index e1023c7b8fb0..417f1086e764 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pvpanic.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
> #include <uapi/misc/pvpanic.h>
>
> static void __iomem *base;
> +static unsigned int events = PVPANIC_PANICKED | PVPANIC_CRASH_LOADED;
> +module_param(events, uint, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(events, "set event limitation of pvpanic device");
I do not understand you wanting a module parameter as well as a sysfs
file. Why is this needed? Why are you spreading this information out
across different apis and locations?
Again, adding module parameters is almost never a good idea anymore,
they are a pain to manage and use.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists