[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210108152447.116871-1-f.suligoi@asem.it>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:24:47 +0100
From: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>
Subject: [PATCH v1] Documentation: ACPI: add new rule for gpio-line-names
The gpio-line-names lists must respect some rules.
This patch adds a new rule in documentation, to avoid
the use of duplicate names in the same gpiochip.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>
---
Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
index b36aa3e743d8..4e264c16ddff 100644
--- a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
+++ b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ following rules (see also the examples):
other words, it is not mandatory to fill all the GPIO lines
- empty names are allowed (two quotation marks ``""`` correspond to an empty
name)
+ - names inside one GPIO controller/expander must be unique
Example of a GPIO controller of 16 lines, with an incomplete list with two
empty names::
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists