linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/5] drm/msm/dsi_pll_10nm: Fix variable usage for pll_lockdet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210109135112.147759-5-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Date:   Sat,  9 Jan 2021 14:51:11 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
To:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
        martin.botka@...ainline.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run,
        airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] drm/msm/dsi_pll_10nm: Fix variable usage for pll_lockdet_rate

The PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1 was being programmed with a hardcoded value
directly, but the same value was also being specified in the
dsi_pll_regs struct pll_lockdet_rate variable: let's use it!

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c
index 5be562dfbf06..df3e4584dfd7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c
@@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ static void dsi_pll_commit(struct dsi_pll_10nm *pll)
 		  reg->frac_div_start_mid);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_HIGH_1,
 		  reg->frac_div_start_high);
-	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, 0x40);
+	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1,
+		  reg->pll_lockdet_rate);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCK_DELAY, 0x06);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_CMODE, 0x10);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_10nm_PHY_PLL_CLOCK_INVERTERS,
-- 
2.29.2