linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] proc_sysctl: fix oops caused by incorrect command parameters.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:50:08 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        yzaikin@...gle.com, adobriyan@...il.com,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, wangle6@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] proc_sysctl: fix oops caused by incorrect command
 parameters.

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 21:10:25 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:

> > > Why would that matter? A missing value is clearly a error path and it
> > > should be reported.
> > 
> > This test is in the correct place. I think it's just a question of the
> > return values.
> 
> I was probably not clear. The test for val is at the right place. I
> would just expect -EINVAL and have the generic code to report.

It does seem a bit screwy that process_sysctl_arg() returns zero in all
situations (parse_args() is set up to handle an error return from it). 
But this patch is consistent with all the other error handling in
process_sysctl_arg().