[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/sYxq9AhQbF4j74@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:09:58 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
lenb@...nel.org, mchehab@...nel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
yong.zhi@...el.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
bingbu.cao@...el.com, tian.shu.qiu@...el.com,
robert.moore@...el.com, erik.kaneda@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, m.felsch@...gutronix.de,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com, slongerbeam@...il.com,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] software_node: Fix refcounts in
software_node_get_next_child()
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:28:24PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> The software_node_get_next_child() function currently does not hold
> references to the child software_node that it finds or put the ref that
> is held against the old child - fix that.
>
> Fixes: 59abd83672f7 ("drivers: base: Introducing software nodes to the firmware node framework")
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists